Stumble This | You should also watch “Hubble's Expanding Universe: Evidence for the Big Bang” |
Very cool
Comments 
playlists with this video
Nature / Biology / The Universe by Constitutional_Patriot
who voted for this video
swampgirl
- Gunter
- Violator99
- Constitutional_Patriot
- Irishman
- kulpims
- theaceofclubz
- firefly
- Zonbie
- gwiz665
- blutruth
- kronosposeidon
- choggie
- mundanest
- Raigen
- HistNerd
- bcglorf
- b0ost
- mj0lnir
- sineral
- Kuga
- rbar
- Fade
- littledragon_79
- dbalsdon
- mockerynj
- Kreegath
- JAPR
- ant
- ashes2flames
- drattus
- eric3579
- Zeph
- Baera
- LadyDeath
- doogle
- Issykitty
- Doc_M
- daxgaz
- R0SENCRANTZ
who has this post bookmarked
Fade
Scientists Attempt To Recreate The Big Bang Related Videos
 The Large Hadron Collider : Big Bang v2.0 |  Big Bang: Science vs. God in a new book called "Blasphemy" |  Before the Big Bang |
Top New Science Videos by Vote
- Why Do Asian Students Perform Better in School than Latinos? (Hint: It’s Not Simply a Matter of Socioeconomic Background)
- Zimbabwean Crisis: Z$100 Billion Note Won’t Even Buy You Lunch
- “Robot Restaurant” Actually Run by Two Identical Couples
- Identical Twins Begot Identical Twins!
- Newspaper Misspelled Own Name
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
This is brilliant, its Black Mesa all over again...
My money is on them not finding it, and once again the string theorists will fiddle the equations to keep themselves in funding.
"While it's considered unlikely that a catastrophic explosion could result..."
and right after it was explained to him that these reactions already happen in nature all the time. The only trick is that they are so small we need a device like this to make them happen in a very precise location we can build detectors around to observe the results. The reaction isn't novel, the ability to observe it with the required precision to learn anything is.
> theorists will fiddle the equations to keep themselves in funding.
If they didn't waste all our money on war, we could definitely build a machine big enough to destroy the universe.
"... while it's considered unlikely that a catastrophic explosion could come ..."
I'm sorry but that's just not good enough for me. I want to hear "there is a 100% certainty based on irrefutable evidence unanimously agreed upon" etc .. that we aren't going to unleash hell on earth .. the end times .. and so on.
http://www.lhcconcerns.com/
If they didn't waste all our money on war, we could definitely build a machine big enough to destroy the universe.
You're assuming the two are mutually exclusive.
@ ashes2flames, that level of certainty doesn't exist, especially in the realm of quantum physics.
errm .. maybe that's bad news.