you cant debunk a statement of moral proposition for Christs sake. I mean wtf, are you insane?
you can't produce evidence for ethical conduct, if you could do that ethics would be science and it isn't.

Never considered how ironic it really is that the US being on the far fringes of capitalism and while emanating minimal communal altruism through through its health care and social security system for a developed nation, pretends to be a beacon of religious compassion and good samaritanism.

>> ^bluecliff:
you cant debunk a statement of moral proposition for Christs sake. I mean wtf, are you insane?
you can't produce evidence for ethical conduct, if you could do that ethics would be science and it isn't.


That is true. However there is much to be gleaned from the social interactions that benefit the propagation of a population over long periods of time with application of evolutionary theory as explored in this video.

>> ^bluecliff:
you cant debunk a statement of moral proposition for Christs sake. I mean wtf, are you insane?
you can't produce evidence for ethical conduct, if you could do that ethics would be science and it isn't.


Accepting your premise (of which I mostly agree), then the religious "moralists" are guilty of making the same accusations, yes?

Also, the film "Expelled" and it's repellent alignment of Darwin's elegant theory with National Socialism is not a very good example of Natural Selection. The holocaust was, in fact, a perfect example of artificial selection.

The debunk is that "Atheists are immoral, because they are atheists"
Ethics are social science.

>> ^bluecliff:
you cant debunk a statement of moral proposition for Christs sake. I mean wtf, are you insane?
you can't produce evidence for ethical conduct, if you could do that ethics would be science and it isn't.